Two Police vehicles and Mr. Brandt are depicted in this October 23, 1994 “crime” scene. Mr. Brandt was involved when Mr. Broadbent summoned the Police on this day when I was falsely accused of damaging a tree on my driveway. Mrs. Brandt had testified for Mr. Broadbent’s client in 1995.  She told the Court I “floored it” when she walked in front of my parked car in May of 1993.  In October of 1997 she testified again, but this time she swore my moving car sped up while she ran and it missed her by inches.  Mrs. Broadbent always asked her to meet her son at the bus stop due to supposed fear of my car caused by this false accusation made against me, yet Mr. Broadbent swore he was not mindful of this “similar fact evidence” until his wife accused me similarly on December 8, 1996.  The stories were more similar after they were changed.  Interestingly, this false similar fact evidence was the reason I was prosecuted for the purpose of stopping me from moving a log off my driveway, and there were no conditions for my release from jail regarding Mrs. Broadbent or her false "similar fact" accusation.  I think the video of December 22, 1996 proves the theory that I was prosecuted just so that, "conditions could be set for my release".  The conditions were obviously meant to do nothing but stop me from moving the log or snow from my shared driveway in accordance with Mr. Broadbent's wishes.