(page 236) accepting it, but at this point in time, I don't see the relevance.
MR. TOWNSEND: Well, I guess the (relevance is I had to...I had to take a lot of pictures to show what he was doing to me and this...
THE COURT: I don't think that that is relevant. Mr. Townsend, maybe we can get one thing very clear. The fact that you're taking a lot of pictures does not have very much relevance. What you are being accused of and what you have to answer to is specifically taking pictures that are...that are of a personal nature, that is, pictures of
the Broadbent family. Am I summarizing that correctly, Mr. Clark?
MR. CLARK: Yes. That...my argument at the end of the day is going to be that is part of the conduct that the accused did which gave the Broadbent's reason to be concerned about their safety, culminating in the motor vehicle incident on December 8th.
THE COURT: So that...that is what you have to answer to, Mr. Broad...Mr.
Townsend. I think it is conceded that you took a lot of pictures, that there was a dispute regarding the...the easement.
MR. TOWNSEND: Ah hm.
THE COURT: Therefore, I'd ask you to res...restrict any further questions to (page 237) what has just been stated, that is, the taking of personal pictures and the conduct complained of on December 8th. (Judge Lajoie prefers “conduct” to “allegation”…)